This week Gaslit Nation takes a look at two dynasties โ the Trump Crime Familyโs attempt to build a dynastic kleptocracy in the White House, and Meghan and Harryโs flight to Canadian freedom. Yes, like a dystopian US Weekly, Gaslit Nation takes on Megxit (weโre in favor!) and the issues surrounding it: racism and colonialism, the mendacity of the UK tabloid press, Prince Andrew the Pedophile, and the decades-long connections of the royal family to the transnational crime syndicate propping up Trump.
Donald Trump has transformed the United States into a laughing stock and he is a danger to the world. He must be removed from the White House before things get even worse.
Donald Trump is not fit to be president of theย United States. He does not possess the requisite intellect and doesย not understand the significance of the office he holdsย nor the tasks associated with it. He doesn’t read. He doesn’t bother to peruse important files and intelligence reports and knows little about the issues that he has identified as his priorities. His decisions are capricious and they are delivered in the form of tyrannical decrees.
He is a man free of morals. As has been demonstrated hundreds of times, he is a liar, a racist and a cheat. I feel ashamed to use these words, as sharp and loud as they are. But if they apply to anyone, they apply toย Trump. And one of the media’s tasks is to continue telling things as they are: Trump has to be removed from the White House. Quickly. He is a danger to the world.
Trump is a miserable politician. He fired the FBI director simply because he could. James Comey had gotten under his skin with his investigation into Trump’s confidants. Comey had also refused to swear loyalty and fealty to Trump and to abandon the investigation. He had to go.
Someone on the question-and-answer website Quora asked โWhy do some British people not like Donald Trump?โ Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England wrote the following response:
ย
A few things spring to mind.
ย
Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace โ all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.
So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trumpโs limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.
ย
Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing โ not once, ever.
I donโt say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility โ for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.
ย
But with Trump, itโs a fact. He doesnโt even seem to understand what a joke is โ his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.
ย
Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.
ย
And scarily, he doesnโt just talk in crude, witless insults โ he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.
ย
There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. Itโs all surface.
ย
ย
Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.
Well, we donโt. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.
ย
And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.
Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.
Heโs not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.
ย
Heโs more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.
ย
And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.
ย
There are unspoken rules to this stuff โ the Queensberry rules of basic decency โ and he breaks them all. He punches downwards โ which a gentleman should, would, could never do โ and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless โ and he kicks them when they are down.
ย
So the fact that a significant minority โ perhaps a third โ of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think โYeah, he seems like my kind of guyโ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:
โข Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
โข You donโt need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.
ย
This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.
After all, itโs impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.
ย
He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.
In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws โ he would make a Trump.
ย
And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:
โMy Godโฆ whatโฆ haveโฆ Iโฆ created?
If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.
โHeather Cox Richardson, a history professor, has been a breakout star of the newsletter platform Substackโ โ New York Times โข Read today’s Letters From an American
Hidden within Nobel winner Kazuo Ishiguroโs novel is a powerful critique of neoliberalism
by ARIEL SARAMANDI
At the end of Kazuo Ishiguroโs The Remains of the Day,ย Stevens, the former butler whose reminiscences constitute the entire plot of the novel, wonders what kind of dignity is to be salvaged from his life.
Stevens is an indelible narrator because he is in the business of convincing himself, over and over again, that his life has significance, that he is a consummate professional, a loyal butler, one of great standing. Underneath the voice lies the tremulous undercurrent of his shattered self: feelings of shame, heartbreak, worthlessness.