Carol Reed’s ‘The Third Man’ Turns 75

The Third Man debuted 75 years ago and even though he didn’t write, direct, or play the starring role, his performance as Harry Lime nevertheless makes it

By Matt Hansen | Sept 2025

The Third Man debuted 75 years ago and even though he didn’t write, direct, or play the starring role, his performance as Harry Lime nevertheless makes it feel like an Orson Welles movie. It’s unfortunate that the focus falls so squarely on him, since a stellar crew were involved in making it. The screenplay was written by Graham Greene based on his original story, with Sir Carol Reed sitting in the director’s chair, and it stars the underrated Joseph Cotton, who appeared in several of the great director’s best films, including Citizen Kane. Welles dominates the movie because his natural charm and devilish charisma are a perfect fit for what the movie understands about the mendacity of disaster.

Sir Carol Reed

We’re in post-WWII Vienna and everything is askew. The grand, cultivated city has been ravaged by war and fascism and economic collapse. The streets are carved up into officially designated Russian, German, and English sectors. People are scrounging to survive, the black market is bustling, and everyone is on the take. Reed expertly depicts the moral and social chaos: expressionistic camera shots are tilted at a dizzying “Dutch angle” which enhances the paranoia and claustrophobia. The film’s pacing has an anxious rhythm as various characters negotiate their legal and moral fates. Anton Karas’ deceptively jaunty theme and spine-tingling zither soundtrack is legendary. Even though it’s shot without color, even incorporating actual footage from the postwar Viennese streets, the morality of the situation is anything but black and white.

Enter Joseph Cotton’s naïve American Holly Martens, a writer of pulp westerns who is in town for a job promised by his old friend Harry Lime. Martens is a good guy though it’s immediately clear that he’s in over his head. Lime has apparently died in a freak car accident, which understandably shakes Martens up, though, given the sardonic expressions on the faces of those who tell him the news, there’s something else going on with his enigmatic old friend. He wants to defend his friend’s honor until he finds out what he was really doing. It turns out that Lime was swiping penicillin from the government, watering it down, and selling it at a marked-up rate to hospitals on the black market. Apparently selling bogus penicillin is especially cruel because it makes the patient immune to future doses of the real drug. Lime has both figuratively and literally been making a killing — including children with meningitis. As the wry English Officer Calloway puts it: “the lucky ones died.”

Five years after the outbreak of the pandemic, Lime’s ruthless opportunism doesn’t seem dated. Award-winning investigative reporter J David McSwane, author of the lively Pandemic, Inc: Chasing the Capitalists and Thieves Who Got Rich While We Got Sick wrote that “a global scarcity of masks created an unregulated market that grew as the Trump administration left states and hospitals to fend for themselves in bidding wars that drove up prices.”

McSwane quotes one hustling wannabe broker of stockpiled M94 masks, wheeling and dealing with the VA midflight about masks he doesn’t even have access to:

“it’s a bunch of buccaneers and pirates! But so were the men who made America. You’re gonna have a lot of millionaires that come out of this. They’re just scoundrels. You have this black market. When the cat’s away the mice will play.”

True indeed. And, though we have not gotten better, nor have we  gotten worse with time; evidently the film’s penicillin based plot point had a real life basis.

The scene when Martens discovers that Lime is indeed very much alive is one of the great entrances in movie history. A cat curls up to a well-dressed leg in a darkened doorway as light from a window suddenly shines across Welles’ face which alternately flickers with bemusement, arrogance, and playful nonchalance. Iconic movie reviewer Roger Ebert named it the very moment when he was “lost to the movies” and crooned that The Third Man “embodies the romance of the movies.” It’s easy to see why. Great skill both behind and in front of the camera is required to make us gasp when we see Lime, especially given that we know what a louse he truly is.

When the old friends finally stand face-to-face, they are standing on a Ferris Wheel, which provides both a reasonable spot for a private chat with a fugitive and a great metaphor for the coldly distant attitude Lime has on the rest of the world. This very short scene is a masterclass in minimalism; Lime’s genuinely happy to see his old friend, pleased at his own cunning, sizing up whether his old pal Martens is considering killing him or being killed by him, and cagily tries to appeal to both Marten’s conscience and his cynicism.

At one point he tells Martens to look down at the tiny people milling around far below and frankly asks if he would really care if one of those dots suddenly stopped moving. The reasonable delivery of Lime’s nihilism is chilling. Of course, you know what he means — we pass strangers down on their luck or hear about X number of people who died on the news pretty much every day and barely give it a second thought. Stalin famously said that “one death is a tragedy. A million deaths is a statistic.” The mass murderer was utterly wrong. Each statistic represents a million specific tragedies. Yet you can’t help but notice how power creates callousness, how easy it is to disengage from the reality of other people’s lives, and how elites of any kind can easily mistake the people beneath them as no more than dollar signs, lines on a chart, numbers on a page, consumers of an algorithm.

Lime finishes, naturally, with a grandiose rhetorical flourish. He chides Martens for being “gloomy” and quotes an undefined source about how “in Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonard Da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace — and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock.” He really sells the comedy in that last sentence. Putting aside whether this is historically accurate, the more you think about the implications the more ridiculous and downright diabolical they become.

What’s he even saying? To take life by the horns? You’ve got to break eggs to make an omelet? Therefore, it’s ok to get rich from prolonging the misery of already helpless and suffering people because at least you have the balls to get yours, no matter who is affected in the process? I’m sure I don’t have to point out where we all might have heard that mentality expressed, both on screen and off. You hear different characters say things like that in the movies all the time and one attribute of today’s world is that it sure seems like life is imitating art. The way that Reed and Welles tell it though, is nonpareil – as the Guardian notes, the film is “near-perfect.”

 

It’s Harry’s swagger, the confidence, the bravado that sells it. Almost. Welles is clearly relishing playing the bad guy, and not for the first or last time in his career. He knows how Lime really enjoys being himself, a very seductive quality. Which makes him a warning. We see throughout the film how even his girlfriend. played with alluring reserve by the lovely Adia Valli, knows he’s terrible and still loves him. Martens, the kindly schmuck, falls for her and she’s having none of it. It’s Harry Lime who they both reminisce about, puzzle over, and who makes the most lasting impact. Like the movie characters, audiences wanted more: there was a spinoff radio series about Lime, played by Welles, and comic books and TV series. I won’t give away the ending, but there’s a heartbreakingly vivid demonstration (using a Van Gogh reference) of how even if a person is proven to be a monster, it’s not always enough to break their hold on those who love them.

 

Source: Carol Reed’s ‘The Third Man’ Turns 75 – Book and Film Globe

Melania Trump is a scowling void of pure nothingness in her ghastly film – review

Hitting cinemas as the streets of America remain filled with the angry and grieving, the vulgar, gilded lifestyle of the Trumps makes them look like Marie Antoinette skulking in her cake-filled chateau

By Nick Hilton

Melania Trump – born Melanija Knavs – has led an undeniably fascinating life. Raised in the 1970s, in what was then Yugoslavia, she grew up in a state-run housing complex in present-day Slovenia. A teenage modelling contract saw her whisked around Europe and then, in the Nineties, to the United States, where she eventually met the unassuming, mild-mannered property tycoon, Donald Trump. It is a journey that bridges Europe and America, an aspirational story of a little girl with nothing but a perfect jawline; the sort of tale that draws the eye of Hollywood. Of course, this is all information I have extracted from Melania Trump’s Wikipedia page, because it is strikingly absent from the new Amazon documentary, Melania, which has just received a mysterious theatrical release.

Instead, Melania focuses on 20 days running up to the second Trump inauguration in January 2025. “Everyone wants to know,” Melania growls in voiceover, “so here it is.” Perhaps her lack of specificity on what exactly people want to know is deliberate. The documentary – with a runtime of 104 minutes – covers everything from the design of place settings and the width of hat ribbons to her excitement for her son Barron’s hypothetical “beautiful family” and sadness at the 2024 death of her mother. “Not a day goes by when I don’t think about my mother,” she laments in the film’s signature voiceover, while the camera holds a shot of the coffin of President Carter. This is American history through the idiosyncratic prism of a woman who is part-puppet of the regime, part-delusional creative, and part-symbol of America’s immigrant community.

“The golden age of America begins right now!” Trump bleats in his inaugural address, while Melania sits behind him, her face twitching unnervingly between pout and smile. Woven through the documentary’s depiction of the events in the run-up to the Trumps’ return to the White House are signs of the film’s strange genesis. Melania’s chief of staff denies a request from Matt Belloni, the entertainment journalist, to hear more about her mysterious Amazon deal. At the banquet dinner on inauguration eve (where guests are served a gold egg and caviar, because, as a sycophantic designer tells the first lady, “white and gold is you!”) viewers will repeatedly spy Amazon proprietor Jeff Bezos alongside other oligarchs like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg and Tim Cook. For the rights to tell this “story”, Amazon paid around $40m, including $28m directly to Mrs Trump. An expensive seat at an expensive table.

But bearing first-person witness to history is a valuable commodity. The reins of the film have been handed to Brett Ratner, the director of Rush Hour and Tower Heist. His career has stalled somewhat after allegations of sexual assault and harassment (which he has denied) were made in 2017 (he also made a recent cameo in the release of select parts of the Epstein files). But just as Trump is getting a second shot at the presidency, so too does Ratner get his second chance. Who is your favourite musician, Ratner (against whom there have been accusations of wrongdoing) asks Melania. She responds with “Michael Jackson” (against whom there have been accusations of wrongdoing), detailing how she met the late singer with her husband (against whom there have been accusations of wrongdoing). Perhaps this is Ratner’s vision for a modern American: a country of forgiveness.

“No matter where [people] come from,” Melania announces during one of her grating voiceovers, “we are bound by the same humanity.” Though she speaks with a thick Slavic drawl, she refers only obliquely to her “country of birth” (Slovenia is referenced, directly, once). A parade of immigrants, including French-born fashion designer Hervé Pierre, appear to reinforce this vaguely cosmopolitan angle. “Opportunities, equality,” says Tham Kannalikham, a designer who moved to the US from Laos aged just two. “It’s really the American dream.” These are the good immigrants serving the Trump administration; a far cry from the ones in cages, the ones tear-gassed on the streets of Minneapolis, the ones festering in a jail cell in El Salvador.

To call Melania vapid would do a disservice to the plumes of florid vape smoke that linger around British teenagers. She calls herself a “mother, wife, daughter, friend”, yet is only depicted preening and scowling. Figures like Brigitte Macron and Queen Rania of Jordan appear to bolster Melania’s geopolitical credentials, yet time and again she returns to banal aphorisms. “Cherish your family and loved ones,” she implores audiences, who were, up until then, neglecting their family and despising their loved ones. Trump himself is an instantly more charismatic presence on screen. His scenes offer a relief from Melania’s mask of pure nothingness. Hitting cinemas as the streets of America remain filled with the angry and grieving – with the country on the verge of an irreparable schism – the vulgar, gilded lifestyle of the Trumps makes them look like Marie Antoinette skulking in her cake-filled chateau, or Hermann Göring’s staring up at his looted Monet.

The “film” is part propaganda, sure, and part sop to Big Tech companies who require constant regulatory approval for financial manoeuvrings. Even then, it is bad. It will exist as a striking artefact – like The Birth of a Nation or Triumph of the Will – of a time when Americans willingly subordinated themselves to a political and economic oligopoly. Organising plans for his return to the White House at 2am, after the Starlight Ball, Trump announces he will immediately “begin straightening out the nation”. “We’re all very grateful,” his event producer whimpers sycophantically. It is a visceral moment where audiences, around the world, will begin to taste the boot that the American establishment so blithely licks.

Then again, perhaps Melania is merely a piece of post-modern post-entertainment. After all, it is transparently not a documentary. Melania spends most scenes playing a staged version of herself, and shots of the first lady are composed with all the deliberateness Ratner brought to his work on X-Men: The Last Stand. This is somewhere between reality TV and pure fiction. As Donald and Melania waltz on the eve of their victory, a singer blares out: “Glory, glory, hallelujah! His truth is marching on.” Whose truth it is, however, and where it’s going, seems beyond the power of this captured documentary to reveal.

Source: Melania Trump is a scowling void of pure nothingness in her ghastly film – review