It’s 1976. You’re an Oscar nominated director. Your last film, which you wrote and directed for free, crashed at the box office.
By Paul Markey
It’s 1976. You’re an Oscar nominated director. Your last film, which you wrote and directed for free, crashed at the box office. The Hollywood studios aren’t hot for your re-imagining of the Arthurian legend and you’ve got bills to pay. Who are you? You’re John Boorman, director of Point Blank, Deliverance and (the aforementioned box-office bust) Zardoz. It was under these circumstances that Boorman decided to accept an offer from John Calley of Warner Bros. to make Exorcist II: The Heretic, the sequel to the most successful horror film ever made.
The director had been offered the job of directing the original, but turned it down feeling it was nothing less than ‘child torture’ – surely nobody would want to watch that. Ten Oscar nominations and hundreds of millions of dollars worldwide had proved him wrong – as least as to what audiences were willing to watch. Boorman wasn’t going to make the same mistake twice. The original is all about evil, he reasoned, so his film would be about ‘good’. Stanley Kubrick wasn’t so sure. He told Boorman that the only way to make a successful sequel to The Exorcist was to give people more gore than before.
Turns out they were both right. I think we can all agree – me, you, Boorman and Kubrick – that trying to top a film like The Exorcist would be a fool’s errand; it is a picture that transcends horror to be a great example of the power of cinema
The Observer film critic on his hero, who died last week aged 87, a man dedicated to telling stories his way and who had a wicked sense of humour
By Mark Kermode
In his excellent 1990 biography, Hurricane Billy: The Stormy Life and Films of William Friedkin, writer Nat Segaloff quotes the Oscar-winning film-maker as wryly observing: “You know what it’s going to say on my tombstone? It’s going to say ‘The Man Who Directed The Exorcist.’” As someone who has spent a lifetime declaring The Exorcist (1973) to be the greatest movie ever made, I understand how it might perhaps have overshadowed a career that was as long as it was varied.
Directing Gene Hackman in The French Connection
Yet Friedkin, whom I first met back in the 1990s when I was a starstruck fan (which I remained), did so much more than helm the movie that changed my life – and the lives of many others. He proved himself one of the most fearless and inventive directors of his generation, working in a string of genres – from musical comedy to serious psychodrama; political satire to police thriller; stage play adaptations to tales of supernatural terror – with equal ease and enthusiasm.
My initial encounter with Friedkin – whom everyone called Billy – was on the phone, in 1990, when I interviewed him about his bonkers psycho-nanny/killer-tree movie (yes, really), TheGuardian. The reviews had not been good, but Friedkin was typically unfazed. Back in 1977, the reviews for his Wages of Fear remake Sorcerer had also been excoriating and the film had been a major box-office flop. Yet Sorcerer is now widely acknowledged to be one of Friedkin’s finest films – a gruellingly nihilistic exercise in nail-biting suspense; a hellish journey into the heart of darkness. Crucially, Friedkin understood that not every film finds its audience first time around, and so he was equally upbeat when the erotic thriller Jade took a similar drubbing in 1995, defiantly telling me at the time that it was “probably my favourite movie”. (He later said he’d been joking, but I think in the moment he meant it.)
I met Friedkin in person for the first time in 1991, when I went to LA to interview him for the Channel 4 documentary Fear in the Dark. I expected him to be a dark and brooding presence but he was quite the opposite – casually dressed, hugely relaxed and positively playful in his demeanour. On camera he was charming and funny, talking enthusiastically about his love of Psycho(“It wrestles you to the ground”), asking me if liked opera (I knew nothing about the subject), and hilariously declaring on camera that he “couldn’t give a flying fuck into a rolling doughnut” that The Exorcist didn’t win best picture in 1974 because it was “clearly the best picture of the year”. Ha!
Our paths crossed again in 1997 after he picked up a copy of my BFI modern classics volume on The Exorcist in an LA bookstore. The phone rang, and when I heard the words “I have Billy Friedkin on the line for you”, I went weak at the knees, convinced he was calling to demand who the hell I thought I was, writing a book about his movie. To my relief, he told me he thought the book was “great” and he’d bought all the copies in the store! Relieved, I immediately proposed a documentary to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the film. The result was The Fear of God (1998, currently on BBC iPlayer) in which he and the film’s writer and producer, William Peter Blatty, looked back on their differing visions of The Exorcist, while cast and crew remembered the enormous (and often alarming) challenges of making that electrifying movie.
Throughout his career, Friedkin never shied away from a challenge, insisting that if a film had a good story – whatever the genre – then he was game. His earliest works include the 1962 documentary The People v Paul Crump, which was partly credited with the commutation of its subject’s death sentence. Decades later, I had the privilege of collaborating with Friedkin on the narration for his demonic-possession documentary The Devil and Father Amorth(2017), although despite my co-writer credit, the voice of that film remains solely and unmistakably Friedkin’s. (I remember standing on one leg in the corner of a car park in Cornwall, trying to get a phone signal to Friedkin in LA, and shouting “It’s not about faith, it’s about doubt” to the bemusement of the seagulls.)
Having directed one of the last episodes of The Alfred Hitchcock Hour in 1965 (“Did Hitchcock give you any advice?”; “Yes, he said ‘Our directors usually wear ties’”), Friedkin made his feature film debut with the Sonny and Cher vehicle Good Times (1967), which he presciently described as a cautionary tale about “selling your soul to the devil”. He brought Harold Pinter’s The Birthday Party and Mart Crowley’s The Boys in the Band to the screen in 1968 and 1970 respectively, and directed Bert Lahr in his final role in the nostalgic burlesque romp The Night They Raided Minsky’s (1968), alongside Britt Ekland, Jason Robards and Norman Wisdom. Yes, really.
Linda Blair, Max von Sydow and Jason Miller in The Exorcist (1973). Photograph: Allstar/Hoya Productions
But it was with the best picture Oscar winner The French Connection (1971) that Friedkin really made his mark, adapting the true story of a record-breaking drugs bust into an edge-of-your-seat thriller that took stylistic inspiration from Costa-Gavras’s Z (1969), and looked more like a documentary than a drama. It was that sense of verité grit and realism that convinced Blatty that Friedkin was the only director who could bring his supernatural bestseller The Exorcist to the screen, making audiences believe that what they were watching was real.
The Exorcist is among my most favorite movies (see Johnny Foreigner’s Top 20 Films of All Time). I agree with Lily Percy and Mark Kermode, who discuss the film on the podcast below, that The Exorcist is a film masterpiece.
I would add that there are several scenes that elevate this movie from a campy horror to a brilliant classic: Burnstyn’s character Chris MacNeil nervously meeting Jason Miller’s Father Karras in a Georgetown park has always brought tears to my eyes – the way Burnstyn carefully navigates to her question, “how does one go about getting an exorcism” before falling apart. “it’s my little girl!” I’ve cried during that scene more than once – and it wasn’t from fear. Also, any parent who has been to the brink of despair as their child suffers through medical tests, relates to Burnstyn’s character in the scene when doctors suggest a second spinal tap. Later, when talking with Miller’s Father Karras she cries out in frustration, “Jesus Christ, won’t somebody help me?” Yet Chris MacNeil never really embraces “the power of Christ” or Catholicism. She merely embraces anyone or anything who can help her daughter. Unforgettable characterization.
I’ve always been moved by one of the film’s last scenes, when Burnstyn asks Miller/Karras “is she going to die?” Sitting alone on the stairs, Karras feels mentally and spiritually defeated. Karras is fighting an additional battle, as he knows Regan is in danger of dying from the stress on her heart. Yet Karras repies “No,” and lifts himself back up the stairway, determined to beat the devil. Such a moment.
In his 1973 lukwarm review, film critic Roger Ebert wrote that The Exorcist was “a triumph of special effects.” Nonsense. Without the heartbreakingly human characterizations created by Burnstyn, and Jason Miller – the film would have failed, pea soup, revolving heads, and all.
As for the title theme of this podcast, this movie changed me as well,
Listen to the podcast below
The Exorcist is known for being absolutely terrifying, but film critic Mark Kermode argues that it’s also a masterpiece. He was too young to see the movie when it was released and had to wait six years before he could watch it in a theater. Decades later, he has made documentaries about The Exorcist, written long essays and a book about it, and even became friends with the movie’s director and screenwriter. But he says every time he watches the movie, he’s still taken back to the experience of transcendence and magic he experienced when he watched the movie for the first time. [ . . . ]
ONEBEING.ORG
Continue reading podcast transcript at the source: ONEBEING.ORG